How British Rule was bad for India Essay

sensation mood in which British witness did not help India was that they had a mischievous effect on Indian Trade. India at the time was a key maker of cotton plant but when the British came into powerfulness they also brought cheaper cotton from Britain. This meant that many cotton incidentories were being forced out of parentage by cheaper cotton abroad. In a sense the British were deindustrialising India. If British control was really good for India, it would have tested to develop the country in classical areas as such as its trade. However, this is not what Britain did but they hindered the trade. A particular position proves this point very well. At the number 1 of British rule, India exported 1 million yards of cotton from Britain. 3 decades later this figure travel to 450 million yards of cotton.This shows that Britain was destroying Indias trade. Another way in which British discover was harmful for India was that the British focused too oftentimes on the m ilitary. Britains utmost foreboding was for the safety of the British traders in India and and then put a lot of Indias resources into developing the military to protect them. However, as the Western world was industrialising, India was being left field behind. This is because they werent having any scientific breakthroughs or any ground-breaking inventions and this was due to the lack of education.Britain redundant too untold of Indias resources and funds on the military and not affluent was put into reforming the education system. This is shown by the fact that 32% of government spending was on developing the military but that altogether 1% was dedicated to improving education. at present I have talked to British Rule was bad for India because Britain deindustrialised India and Britain focused too much on the military.